Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_10.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=CAAG FASTA(n).Sequence=CAAG
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:24:09
Evaluating how sequences fit models
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
ACAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.24, deficit -0.97, CutoffScore  47.03, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UCCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.49, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  57.91, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.30, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AACU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.42, deficit  2.22, CutoffScore  76.61, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.83, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.84, deficit -0.37, CutoffScore  40.78, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UUUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.83, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.47, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  76.08, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.27, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  67.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.93, deficit  0.72, CutoffScore  60.80, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCACG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.76, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  35.99, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
AUAAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.54, deficit  3.34, CutoffScore  64.84, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AAGCU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.94, deficit  1.84, CutoffScore  49.05, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGUUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.33, deficit  0.21, CutoffScore  66.24, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.25, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  25.04, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -10.47, deficit  4.53, CutoffScore  52.31, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.96, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  53.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.39, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  55.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.42, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  53.78, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.80, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  76.17, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.35, CutoffScore  64.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.25, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  78.39, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.08, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  59.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CACGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.96, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  53.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAACU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.35, deficit  0.05, CutoffScore  67.94, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UCAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.07, deficit  1.94, CutoffScore  48.01, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.62, deficit -0.06, CutoffScore  69.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAAAA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.12, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.67, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -9.28, deficit  6.08, CutoffScore  36.02, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.35, CutoffScore  64.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -3.30, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.98, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.41, deficit  0.40, CutoffScore  95.80, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUAAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.54, deficit  3.34, CutoffScore  64.84, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -7.52, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.13, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGCCU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.44, deficit  3.26, CutoffScore  34.05, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -12.17, deficit  6.74, CutoffScore  29.09, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUCCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -4.76, deficit  1.04, CutoffScore  89.59, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUGUCA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score     -10.32, deficit  7.12, CutoffScore  25.08, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCUAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.29, deficit  0.62, CutoffScore  61.92, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCAUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_62934.1,  6 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.78, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
UUAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.47, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  54.00, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGUUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.47, deficit  3.99, CutoffScore  57.95, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAUGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_86883.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.07, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCAAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -8.79, deficit  6.85, CutoffScore  31.33, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUAGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -9.12, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  36.62, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.88, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUCGCA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.91, deficit  2.82, CutoffScore  38.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.07, deficit  1.13, CutoffScore  56.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUUUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.12, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  79.06, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.54, deficit  0.66, CutoffScore  61.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
GAACAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.36, deficit  2.43, CutoffScore  74.47, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.32, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.55, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCGCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.22, deficit  0.30, CutoffScore  65.21, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
UGGUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -9.63, deficit  5.16, CutoffScore  45.72, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAUUG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.45, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.12, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGGACC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.46, deficit  2.34, CutoffScore  43.81, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGCCUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.42, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.10, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
GUCUAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.28, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  62.05, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.35, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  52.10, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUACGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.31, deficit  2.37, CutoffScore  76.23, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUUCCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.80, deficit -0.43, CutoffScore  72.95, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUCUC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.07, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  59.30, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCCCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -8.93, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  35.96, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.28, deficit  2.52, CutoffScore  73.77, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAAUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCGGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.72, deficit -0.20, CutoffScore  38.95, ed  3, 2 cWW                                     
UAGCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99040.1,  6 NTs,                UUGCGG,score      -4.32, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  63.94, ed  1, 1 F-F-F-F-F-F                             
CGGAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.34, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore  41.83, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGGCGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.77, deficit -0.15, CutoffScore  38.39, ed  3, 2 cWW                                     
CCUUGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.97, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.54, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGGUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.47, deficit -0.45, CutoffScore  73.18, ed  1, 1 cWW                                     
GGCUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.17, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.75, ed  2, 1 cWW                                     
CGCGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.94, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  66.89, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUUUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.85, deficit  1.97, CutoffScore  79.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-cSH                               
GACCUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -7.28, deficit  2.81, CutoffScore  38.86, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGCCUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.50, deficit  0.58, CutoffScore  62.33, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -7.58, deficit  3.05, CutoffScore  67.93, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAUAAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.34, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAUUC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_29966.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -4.50, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAUGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.39, deficit -0.85, CutoffScore  45.76, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUCAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.34, CutoffScore  64.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.27, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  63.99, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS-F                               
AUGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.82, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  58.72, ed  2, 0 cWW-cWS-F                               
AGUUAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -8.41, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  56.63, ed  2, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
CCAAAUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.21, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  93.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCAAUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -6.72, deficit  0.98, CutoffScore  89.73, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.87, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  81.66, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUAUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -8.83, deficit  3.36, CutoffScore  33.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAUGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.90, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.01, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUUGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -6.99, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  66.93, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCAAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.20, deficit  0.53, CutoffScore  62.83, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGCGUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.89, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUAAUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score      -9.22, deficit -1.18, CutoffScore  80.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGGAAAA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.28, deficit  2.18, CutoffScore  45.44, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  47.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUGGUUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.91, deficit  2.81, CutoffScore  38.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAACCAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.68, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  53.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
AAAACCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_62934.1,  6 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.37, deficit  1.93, CutoffScore  48.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
CCAGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -10.36, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  26.60, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAUAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_59735.5,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.89, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  52.11, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
ACUGCCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -8.39, deficit  4.66, CutoffScore  22.96, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCGAAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -8.78, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  34.96, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUCAAAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.03, deficit -0.36, CutoffScore  40.67, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAGAGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  66.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUCCAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.41, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  46.70, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GGUGGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.28, deficit -0.11, CutoffScore  69.63, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGUUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -5.89, deficit -0.16, CutoffScore  38.56, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -6.60, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  44.53, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  66.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCCUCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -15.23, deficit  9.67, CutoffScore  12.17, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
GUACGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.91, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.90, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGAAGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.38, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.76, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGGAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.28, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  34.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCGAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.76, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  43.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUCAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.54, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  60.74, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GUAAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.13, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.81, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCCACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.67, deficit  1.21, CutoffScore  24.14, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGGAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -6.80, deficit  2.47, CutoffScore  42.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUAAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.83, deficit  0.43, CutoffScore  63.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -8.20, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  46.51, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAUGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.48, deficit  5.72, CutoffScore  40.39, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUUGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.41, deficit  1.77, CutoffScore  60.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
UGUAUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.23, deficit  7.48, CutoffScore  22.08, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAGGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -10.68, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  44.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAUAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -7.86, deficit  3.42, CutoffScore  48.05, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
GUAGGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -7.18, deficit  1.71, CutoffScore  50.43, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUAAAAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.48, deficit  1.81, CutoffScore  49.41, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUGAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.28, deficit  2.18, CutoffScore  45.46, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGGUGCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -8.23, deficit  3.59, CutoffScore  21.99, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAGUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.29, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore  71.69, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -9.74, deficit  4.22, CutoffScore  55.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  86.40, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAGACAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.92, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  50.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAGUUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -13.34, deficit  6.64, CutoffScore   0.01, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CAUGGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -7.47, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  73.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAACAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -12.22, deficit  6.65, CutoffScore   5.88, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAAAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.80, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.56, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAACCAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -5.38, deficit  2.65, CutoffScore  54.66, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUUCGAUU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.24, deficit -0.16, CutoffScore  70.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUCGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_00914.1,  6 NTs,              GGUCAAAC,score      -6.59, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  63.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.70, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GACAAAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.31, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUCACGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.04, deficit -0.36, CutoffScore  40.64, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCAAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.29, deficit  1.90, CutoffScore  48.39, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAAGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -13.64, deficit  9.01, CutoffScore  25.24, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CUCGUUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -9.29, deficit  3.23, CutoffScore  34.37, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAGAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -5.09, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  32.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUACUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.77, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  22.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAGCAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -9.55, deficit  2.34, CutoffScore  19.76, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCCGGAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score     -10.94, deficit  6.14, CutoffScore  16.17, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
GGAAAUAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -6.45, deficit  1.66, CutoffScore  61.04, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGUAGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score     -10.39, deficit  3.19, CutoffScore  11.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCCAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_85993.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.54, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  66.15, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUAAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.66, deficit  2.41, CutoffScore  75.15, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUAACCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -7.74, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  42.07, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUCCGAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.60, deficit  3.35, CutoffScore  22.88, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CGAGCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  33.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCAAGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -8.93, deficit  4.14, CutoffScore  15.25, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUUGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -9.38, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  28.01, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.29, deficit  2.90, CutoffScore   6.29, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GACGGGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score      -8.45, deficit -0.27, CutoffScore  24.74, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCAGGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.67, deficit  1.28, CutoffScore  54.91, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUCACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.34, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  36.22, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUGAGAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -5.95, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  90.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GUUUUUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -7.77, deficit -0.05, CutoffScore  70.17, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGUCUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -4.86, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  74.47, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAUCCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -10.00, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUGAUUCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -9.66, deficit  3.61, CutoffScore  30.43, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCAUCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.03, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  12.62, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUUAAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -8.14, deficit  2.35, CutoffScore  50.06, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAAAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.55, deficit  1.11, CutoffScore  56.71, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.08, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  66.27, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGAUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.19, deficit  1.45, CutoffScore  28.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAAAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -9.21, deficit  2.77, CutoffScore  49.75, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGAGCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -6.46, deficit  2.54, CutoffScore  55.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCAAGGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.30, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore   6.23, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CACGGGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score      -8.50, deficit -0.22, CutoffScore  24.32, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUGUUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -9.29, deficit  3.23, CutoffScore  34.37, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAAUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.94, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  52.08, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGGAUAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.11, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore  30.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CUUGAAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -8.91, deficit  3.74, CutoffScore  41.11, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAGAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -8.79, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  20.12, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUGAAUCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.76, deficit  6.66, CutoffScore  32.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUUCAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.19, deficit  5.82, CutoffScore  21.14, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUACCAAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.77, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  38.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CGAUAAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.58, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  40.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGCUUAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -8.09, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  56.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
AAAGGCCUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score     -11.39, deficit  2.68, CutoffScore  25.21, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUACUCAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.78, deficit  4.21, CutoffScore  25.95, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CGAACGUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.15, deficit  6.33, CutoffScore  22.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GACGGAGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -6.74, deficit  2.11, CutoffScore  68.17, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CUAAUCAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  43.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAUGGAGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  40.16, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGUUGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -8.65, deficit  2.23, CutoffScore  59.23, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
ACGCGAUCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.06, deficit  5.97, CutoffScore  36.61, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GACGGACGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -7.95, deficit  3.32, CutoffScore  41.98, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CACAAAGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -12.85, deficit  8.22, CutoffScore  11.48, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
UGUCUCCAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -10.59, deficit  3.21, CutoffScore  20.67, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAUUUUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.07, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  44.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAUCGGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -9.65, deficit  2.52, CutoffScore  26.43, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
UUGGGGAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.97, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  58.28, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GCUAAACAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -8.52, deficit  3.35, CutoffScore  43.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGCAUGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -10.01, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  23.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CUGAAGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.50, deficit  5.68, CutoffScore  26.16, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
UGGGAUUAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.37, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  63.52, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGGCUGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -11.39, deficit  6.37, CutoffScore  29.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GUGGGAUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -7.54, deficit  1.72, CutoffScore  51.18, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GCGCUAAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -5.95, deficit  1.16, CutoffScore  71.30, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
CGAGUCGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  15.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCGUGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -12.43, deficit  7.80, CutoffScore  14.10, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAUUAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.61, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGCUAAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -9.30, deficit  1.27, CutoffScore  33.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUGGAUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -6.71, deficit  3.62, CutoffScore  64.95, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CUGUUUGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -11.19, deficit  5.01, CutoffScore  41.34, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
CUGUAUGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.58, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  40.18, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUUUCAAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.68, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  69.03, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GAAUAAUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -12.55, deficit  2.15, CutoffScore  45.81, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUGCCGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -11.51, deficit  1.78, CutoffScore  12.20, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGAAUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score     -10.57, deficit  2.55, CutoffScore  49.04, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAGAUGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -8.14, deficit  1.72, CutoffScore  63.21, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
UCGUUACAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -8.66, deficit  0.58, CutoffScore  41.70, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCCUUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.61, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GGAUUACCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.12, deficit  6.83, CutoffScore  40.86, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGUGGCGUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score     -10.44, deficit  4.66, CutoffScore  28.52, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
UUGAUUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.14, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  24.58, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCACAGCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93383.1,  9 NTs,             GCCCUAAGC,score     -10.81, deficit  7.34, CutoffScore   8.86, ed  3, 3 cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GACAACUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.63, deficit  4.26, CutoffScore  11.57, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUGAUAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score     -10.11, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  25.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAAGCCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  15.20, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGGAAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -9.52, deficit  1.50, CutoffScore  58.70, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAGCUCAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.87, deficit  3.14, CutoffScore  20.56, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAGUUAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -11.34, deficit  3.26, CutoffScore  17.94, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCCCUCGUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.69, deficit  4.12, CutoffScore  43.26, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
AUAAGGAGUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.36, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  49.49, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAUAAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.45, deficit  0.53, CutoffScore  53.76, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GUGAAAGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.83, deficit  1.49, CutoffScore  43.93, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.11, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  49.32, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAUAACGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.08, deficit  5.79, CutoffScore  29.06, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCCAUUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -11.61, deficit  6.98, CutoffScore  19.87, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUAAGGUGCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  24.49, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGUGAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -6.10, deficit  0.38, CutoffScore  77.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
CGAAAUACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -12.93, deficit  3.59, CutoffScore  28.23, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAAUGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score      -9.75, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  23.27, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGAGAAUUUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.72, deficit  5.34, CutoffScore   6.83, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAGUUGAGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -10.09, deficit  2.57, CutoffScore  46.58, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWS-F                               
CCUCCAGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score     -11.48, deficit  6.73, CutoffScore  26.90, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAACGUACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.61, deficit  3.32, CutoffScore  25.86, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGUCGCAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -12.74, deficit  3.82, CutoffScore  23.90, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
CAUUAAUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score      -9.77, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  50.14, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCGGGCCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -10.57, deficit  4.98, CutoffScore  10.20, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGCAAUCAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.68, deficit  2.59, CutoffScore  29.62, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUGCACCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.70, deficit  7.36, CutoffScore  16.94, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUUGAAAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -7.88, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  54.25, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUUAGUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -14.69, deficit  8.51, CutoffScore   6.71, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
CUAAAACAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.42, deficit  7.13, CutoffScore   2.94, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUACGUAAGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.23, deficit  5.94, CutoffScore  28.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAAAGCGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -15.09, deficit  9.86, CutoffScore   5.71, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAACCCGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -16.95, deficit  8.08, CutoffScore   5.14, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAGAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -9.32, deficit  3.60, CutoffScore  36.06, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
CGGAAAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -10.46, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  45.57, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UCUCAAAAUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.35, deficit  6.27, CutoffScore  22.77, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGAUAAUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -13.85, deficit  5.54, CutoffScore   2.80, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGAACGGAUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.99, deficit  4.85, CutoffScore  27.93, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUCUUAAAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.98, deficit  6.33, CutoffScore  26.90, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
UUCUUUUUUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -13.00, deficit  2.99, CutoffScore  40.73, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAGCAAGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score      -9.59, deficit  4.52, CutoffScore  40.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAGAAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.80, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  44.19, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CCUUUCUAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -10.56, deficit  2.47, CutoffScore  24.88, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAAUCUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.38, deficit  8.56, CutoffScore  12.21, ed  3, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUUGCAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -11.46, deficit  6.13, CutoffScore  29.29, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
GGUGAAAAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -13.02, deficit  4.71, CutoffScore   8.35, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUCAAAUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -12.46, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  18.76, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCCAGAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -15.07, deficit  6.74, CutoffScore  28.53, ed  2, 2 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCUUGAGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -11.92, deficit  7.29, CutoffScore  18.30, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAGUAUUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04642.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.80, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  22.36, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAUUGAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.81, deficit  5.47, CutoffScore  29.96, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
GUAAUAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -13.19, deficit  8.85, CutoffScore  25.76, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
GUUUGAGGGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score      -9.12, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.29, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAUUUUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -12.70, deficit  8.35, CutoffScore  13.24, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
GGAUUGUCUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -11.98, deficit  4.86, CutoffScore  44.50, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUUUCAAUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -10.70, deficit  0.09, CutoffScore  61.81, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGACGGGCUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -11.53, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  46.80, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUCGACUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_15118.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -14.16, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore  10.94, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAAAAAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -15.00, deficit  6.74, CutoffScore   1.10, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGUUCGCAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.88, deficit  5.06, CutoffScore  17.83, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAAACCGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score      -9.71, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  52.32, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUUAAAGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.50, deficit  2.89, CutoffScore   6.63, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UCCAGGUUCAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -15.41, deficit  5.97, CutoffScore  24.95, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
GUAACGUAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -11.40, deficit  7.06, CutoffScore  34.71, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
GCCGCUUCCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -12.19, deficit  5.07, CutoffScore  28.10, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGAUCAUUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.42, deficit  5.38, CutoffScore  17.18, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.91, deficit  3.86, CutoffScore   8.33, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
AAUUAACGAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.65, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  45.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGUCAUCCUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -10.63, deficit  5.81, CutoffScore  40.94, ed  2, 2 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUCGGGCUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.38, deficit  5.50, CutoffScore  14.73, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CAGAUUAUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -13.10, deficit  5.03, CutoffScore   5.92, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUCUUCAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.50, deficit  4.52, CutoffScore  24.94, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUCAAUACAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score      -6.57, deficit  2.23, CutoffScore  43.85, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
CAAAUUAAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -9.20, deficit  2.15, CutoffScore  35.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CGACGCGAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -14.46, deficit  7.34, CutoffScore  16.49, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CACCUAUGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -12.77, deficit  5.65, CutoffScore   9.82, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAGCUGACGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -12.45, deficit  4.38, CutoffScore   9.49, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGAAGCUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -15.69, deficit  6.75, CutoffScore   1.96, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UAAAGAAUCAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.05, deficit  7.23, CutoffScore  10.24, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAUAUAAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.12, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  31.57, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGGAUACAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.46, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  22.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGACUUUGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -13.56, deficit  6.44, CutoffScore   5.79, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGCCAAGCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -14.51, deficit  4.27, CutoffScore  20.51, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGCCGCUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_23115.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.13, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore   8.46, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCCAAUUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -12.27, deficit  3.95, CutoffScore  13.42, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCCAAAUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.51, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore   0.34, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGUGCUAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -15.20, deficit  6.67, CutoffScore   4.87, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
ACUCGAGCGUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -14.72, deficit  6.90, CutoffScore   7.10, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GCCUCAAAAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -11.76, deficit  3.95, CutoffScore   6.83, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAACUCUUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -11.42, deficit  3.65, CutoffScore  13.81, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUAUAAAAAUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -10.26, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  30.88, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
AGAGUCGAAAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.36, deficit  5.69, CutoffScore  16.95, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAAUCCGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -13.99, deficit  8.40, CutoffScore   7.97, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCUGAAACUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -13.92, deficit  5.84, CutoffScore   9.82, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAUCGCAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_23010.1,  8 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.62, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  24.49, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAGAAAUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -13.23, deficit  4.23, CutoffScore  26.95, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGACUAAAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.94, deficit  3.65, CutoffScore   5.35, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
GCAAUCAAACGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -13.50, deficit  4.10, CutoffScore   9.38, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAAUCAAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.40, deficit  4.74, CutoffScore   5.40, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUUAUUUAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.62, deficit  5.97, CutoffScore  46.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
GGAAAAGUCCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.83, deficit  2.72, CutoffScore  11.92, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGGUGGCGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -14.58, deficit  4.32, CutoffScore  18.58, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
GAACUGUCUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score     -12.11, deficit  6.66, CutoffScore   6.72, ed  4, 4 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGAAACUGUGCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -19.71, deficit  8.93, CutoffScore   6.22, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUCAGAAUUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.30, deficit  4.56, CutoffScore  23.96, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGGAUAAGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -17.19, deficit  9.41, CutoffScore   7.93, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
AUGAAAGAAGUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.66, deficit  3.92, CutoffScore  10.75, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UUCUGGUUAGCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -14.86, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore  12.65, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
CCGACAUGAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -17.01, deficit  7.97, CutoffScore   2.26, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AAAACCGAAUGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -18.37, deficit 10.29, CutoffScore   2.46, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGAAGAGUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.11, deficit  9.04, CutoffScore   6.98, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GAAAAGACCAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.83, deficit  6.97, CutoffScore   2.35, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGAAAUUUGCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -16.25, deficit  8.87, CutoffScore   3.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAGUUUUCUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.55, deficit  5.79, CutoffScore   2.42, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GAAACAAAUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.22, deficit  3.11, CutoffScore   9.58, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAUAAUUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.67, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore   3.35, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAUCGAGUCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -12.42, deficit  4.08, CutoffScore  43.43, ed  4, 2 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGCUACGAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -18.28, deficit 10.47, CutoffScore  21.33, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGAGCGCUAGUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.13, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  16.13, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAGAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.10, deficit  4.24, CutoffScore   0.70, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCUUCAUCACGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.10, deficit 10.28, CutoffScore   3.60, ed  4, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAUUUCCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -12.76, deficit  3.32, CutoffScore   8.16, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
CAGUUCAAGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.35, deficit  6.95, CutoffScore   1.92, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CCAAAAGAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.63, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  10.91, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGAAAGUAUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -17.12, deficit  6.34, CutoffScore  19.78, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAUGAAGAUUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -16.83, deficit  6.05, CutoffScore   5.61, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAAAAACAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.69, deficit  4.83, CutoffScore  15.45, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUUUAGGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.55, deficit  6.77, CutoffScore   6.15, ed  5, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
UUGAGUAUGCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -16.54, deficit  7.50, CutoffScore   4.99, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAUCUUAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.12, deficit  4.82, CutoffScore  26.81, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
AUCUUCGAGUAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 12 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -11.87, deficit  4.40, CutoffScore   9.64, ed  6, 4 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GGAUCAAUAAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.05, deficit  4.79, CutoffScore  32.18, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
UUGUUUGUGAAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 12 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -12.52, deficit  5.06, CutoffScore  22.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GUAGAAUCAACGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -15.30, deficit  3.15, CutoffScore  11.24, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUAGAACAAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -14.08, deficit  1.93, CutoffScore  18.38, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGUGUGCUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -16.06, deficit  7.29, CutoffScore  10.63, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAAAAAAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.65, deficit  6.79, CutoffScore   3.45, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGGGGGAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11542.1, 10 NTs,         CGAGCGGCCAAAG,score     -11.47, deficit  1.94, CutoffScore  22.39, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCAACUAAGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -16.21, deficit  5.43, CutoffScore   8.86, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAAAAUAAAGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -16.60, deficit  4.45, CutoffScore   3.62, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUCACUUCUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -14.28, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore   3.26, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGGUGGUGAAAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.72, CutoffScore  51.40, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UGAAGAAUGCGAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -17.20, deficit  5.05, CutoffScore  17.66, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUGGAGAAGAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.2, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -17.76, deficit  9.14, CutoffScore   5.94, ed  4, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
UGGAGACCCGGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.37, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  20.65, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAUCGAAGAAAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73183.1, 14 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -17.15, deficit  6.93, CutoffScore   2.73, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
CGAAAAAAUCUGAAUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73183.1, 14 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -16.56, deficit  6.34, CutoffScore  21.18, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 90.0000	  8.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 90.0000	  6.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 66.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 24.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 88.0000	 66.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 88.0000	 36.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 84.0000	 46.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 52.0000	 14.0000
[8 8]	100.0000	 36.0000	  4.0000
[9 9]	100.0000	 22.0000	  0.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  33 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  65 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence  93 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence  93 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 249 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 250 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 266 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 266 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 270 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 299 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 300 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 301 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 307 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 337 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 343 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 352 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 363 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 375 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 391 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 417 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 451 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 471 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 485 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 502 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 513 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 543 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 567 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 580 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 603 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 636 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 636 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 683 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 734 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 736 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 758 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 873 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 881 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 991 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 999 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 1063 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 1089 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 1168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 1189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 3.3846%
Number of models giving false positives is 232 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.64
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     1.48
